Methane is up to 86 times more powerful than CO2 in the short term. Could bacteria help us mitigate the super pollutant?

https://seed.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ThisGreenhouseGasTraps85TimesMoreHeat_Cultured_41025-1024x483.jpeg

Methane (CH4) may not be as talked-about as other greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, but the “super pollutant” is a major contributor to climate change.

Heat-trapping methane is emitted from human industries like agriculture, oil and gas, and waste management. But it also occurs naturally in the environment. As certain microscopic organisms break down organic (living) matter into simpler parts, they release methane as a byproduct. At the same time, other microbes consume methane as an energy source.

As anthropogenic (human-caused) methane emissions rise, researchers are now treating methane-eating bacteria as potential climate solutions. Let’s investigate how methane functions, where it comes from, and how microscopic organisms might be the key to tackling it. 

Methane Emissions 101

Methane concentrations in the atmosphere have more than doubled in the last 200 years, leading the IPCC to declare that tackling methane emissions will be critical for limiting the worst impacts of climate change.1,2 Pound for pound, the gas’ global warming potential is 86 times greater than CO2 over a 20-year period and 34 times greater over 100 years.3

While methane is extremely powerful from a heat-trapping perspective, it’s short-lived. It persists in the environment for 10-12 years compared to carbon dioxide’s thousands.4,5 Therein lies an opportunity: If we’re able to reduce methane emissions, positive climate impacts could follow relatively quickly.

Roughly 60% of these emissions are the result of human activity—primarily in the agriculture, waste, and fossil fuel sectors. (The other 40% comes from natural sources like wetlands, seabeds, and volcanoes.)6,7 

On the farm, ruminant animals like cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats emit methane during digestion. As the bacteria in their gut breaks down food, methane is created, which the animals then release via burps and farts. While other animals (like termites) also create methane as a byproduct of digestion, livestock have an outsized impact on overall methane emissions.8 A single cow can emit 150–500 grams of the gas per day, similar to driving a gas-powered car up to 35 miles.9

Methane can also form when animal manure is left to decompose in lagoons or holding tanks, and when crops are intentionally flooded to control weeds and pests (common in rice production). 

Off the farm, methane is released as trash breaks down in landfills, during wastewater treatment, and at various points of the oil and gas production process.

Summary:

Methane, while less discussed than carbon dioxide, is a significantly more potent greenhouse gas. Unlike CO2, methane only lingers in the atmosphere for about a decade, which means curbing its emissions could lead to fast, meaningful climate benefits.

Methanogens vs. Methanotrophs: A Bacterial Back-And-Forth

Microbes are the unseen orchestrators of the methane cycle. They can both create CH4 under certain conditions and consume it under others. Let’s zoom in on the two groups of microorganisms that form the biological push and pull of methane in our environment: methanogens and methanotrophs. 

  • Methanogens are microbes from the domain Archaea that produce methane as a byproduct of breaking down carbon-based compounds in anaerobic environments.10 (Think: The stomach of a cow or the depths of a landfill.) They are the only known organisms capable of producing methane, but they require a totally oxygen-free environment to do it.
  • Methanotrophs, on the other hand, are microorganisms (mostly bacteria) that consume methane as an energy source.11 They essentially “eat” methane before it escapes into the atmosphere, breaking it down into water and less potent carbon dioxide. (It’s worth noting that this process still releases greenhouse gas into the environment, demonstrating how important it is to reduce methane emissions in the first place.) Unlike methanogens, methanotrophs can survive in oxygenated environments. These methane-hungry bacteria may prove helpful for converting methane into useful products like biofuels (more on this below).

The interplay between methanogens and methanotrophs helps dictate whether a given environment is a methane source (releasing methane into the atmosphere) or sink (absorbing methane from the atmosphere). 

Summary:

Methanogens and methanotrophs play opposing roles in the methane cycle: One type of microbe produces methane while the other consumes it. This invisible tug-of-war determines whether an environment becomes a methane source or sink.

Fighting Methane Emissions With Microbes

Microbial balance clearly plays a powerful—and underappreciated—role in regulating the methane levels around us. Here are a few ways that researchers are starting to leverage microscopic bacteria to mitigate the super pollutant:

  • Recently, there’s been a lot of rumbling (no pun intended) about how adjusting ruminants’ diets might change their stomach conditions and reduce the amount of methane-packed gas they send into the atmosphere. Just as certain foods and probiotics can help reduce gas in humans, they may do the same for livestock.12 However, cattle nutrition is just one part of the equation. In order to significantly cut emissions from agriculture, we’ll need to switch to more soil bacteria-friendly farming practices, reduce global meat consumption, and waste less food.13 
  • Rice paddies tend to be a significant source of methane emissions. Since they’re often flooded to control pests and weeds, they can become anaerobic environments that are conducive to methanogenic (methane-emitting) archaea. Other methods for growing rice, like alternating periods of wetting and drying, may help reduce methane emissions and water use at the same time.14
  • Adjusting landfill design may help breed more methane-eating bacteria. Early research suggests that adding substances like sulfate and iron to landfill mounds can promote methane removal (even in oxygen-free conditions).15 This isn’t a get-out-of-climate-jail free card: To cut emissions, we’ll also need to dramatically reduce the amount of waste we send to landfills in the first place.
  • Certain “extreme” landscapes—such as geothermal springs and volcanic soils—are teeming with methane-gobbling methanotrophs. Some researchers are now studying how the microbes in these areas have naturally evolved to capture methane, in case any of their adaptations provide opportunities for innovation.
  • Methanotrophs have also caught the attention of the biomanufacturing industry. Researchers are now testing how certain strains can convert captured methane into products like bioplastics, reducing the demand for fossil fuels.16 

Summary:

Scientists are increasingly turning to microbes for climate solutions, investigating how these tiny organisms influence methane levels in hotspots like rice paddies, ruminant stomachs, and landfills.

The Key Insight

Microbes are central to the methane cycle, capable of both producing and consuming the potent greenhouse gas. These methanogens and methanotrophs remind us that some of nature’s tiniest residents could be capable of tackling its largest problems.

Citations

  1. Rocher-Ros, G., Stanley, E. H., Loken, L. C., Casson, N. J., Raymond, P. A., Liu, S., Amatulli, G., & Sponseller, R. A. (2023). Global methane emissions from rivers and streams. Nature, 621(7979), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06344-6
  2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/
  3. Jackson, R. B., Abernethy, S., Canadell, J. G., Cargnello, M., Davis, S. J., Féron, S., Fuss, S., Heyer, A. J., Hong, C., Jones, C. D., Matthews, H. D., O’Connor, F. M., Pisciotta, M., Rhoda, H. M., De Richter, R., Solomon, E. I., Wilcox, J. L., & Zickfeld, K. (2021). Atmospheric methane removal: A research agenda. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2210), 20200454. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0454
  4. United Nations Environment Programme, & Climate and Clean Air Coalition. (2021). Global methane assessment: Benefits and costs of mitigating methane emissions. United Nations Environment Programme.
  5. Inman, M. (2008). Carbon is forever. Nature Climate Change, 1(812), 156–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/climate.2008.122
  6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Methane emissions | US EPA. (2025, March 31). US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/methane-emissions#
  8. Ito, A. (2023). Global termite methane emissions have been affected by climate and land-use changes. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44529-1
  9. Broucek, J. (2014). Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: A review. Journal of Environmental Protection, 05(15), 1482–1493. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.515141
  10. American Society for Microbiology. (2022, May 9). How methanogenic archaea contribute to climate change. https://asm.org/articles/2022/may/how-methanogenic-archaea-contribute-to-climate-cha
  11. Kumar, M., Yadav, A. N., Saxena, R., Rai, P. K., Paul, D., & Tomar, R. S. (2021). Novel methanotrophic and methanogenic bacterial communities from diverse ecosystems and their impact on environment. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 33, 102005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102005
  12. Ncho, C., Kim, S., Rang, S., & Lee, S. (2024). A meta-analysis of probiotic interventions to mitigate ruminal methane emissions in cattle: Implications for sustainable livestock farming. Animal, 18(6), 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101180
  13. Lim, J., Wehmeyer, H., Heffner, T., Aeppli, M., Gu, W., Kim, P. J., Horn, M. A., & Ho, A. (2024). Resilience of aerobic methanotrophs in soils; Spotlight on the methane sink under agriculture. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 100(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiae008
  14. Yang, J., Zhou, Q., & Zhang, J. (2016). Moderate wetting and drying increases rice yield and reduces water use, grain arsenic level, and methane emission. The Crop Journal, 5(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.002
  15. Parsaeifard, N., Sattler, M., Nasirian, B., & Chen, V. C. (2020). Enhancing anaerobic oxidation of methane in municipal solid waste landfill cover soil. Waste Management, 106, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.009
  16. Tan, J. N., Ratra, K., Singer, S. W., Simmons, B. A., Goswami, S., & Awasthi, D. (2024). Methane to bioproducts: Unraveling the potential of methanotrophs for biomanufacturing. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 90, 103210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103210

Emma Loewe

Written By

Emma Loewe

Emma Loewe is a writer, author, and the editor of Cultured. Her writing explores the intersection of nature, climate, and human health. She is the author of Return to Nature and the co-author of The Spirit Almanac and her work has appeared in Grist, National Geographic, and Outside Magazine, among others.

Erin Miller

Reviewed By

Erin Miller

Erin is a microbiome scientist with expertise spanning human and environmental health. With over 14 years of experience in biotechnology, biomimicry, and science communication, she focuses on harnessing the potential of microbial systems to drive sustainable innovation. At SeedLabs, Erin drives partnerships and research initiatives that investigate how microbes can contribute to planetary health for climate resilience. She is passionate about translating complex science into accessible and inspiring insights that spark action.